
PUBLISHED
BY MOSHOLU
PRESERVATION
CORPORATION
| Vol.
18, No. 10 |
May 19 - June 1, 2005 |



Complaints Drop but Meals Still
Unsavory
By HEATHER HADDON
Complaints
may have tapered off since the Bronx’ Meals on Wheels program was overhauled
last October, but John Whyte is still not a fan. “It’s garbage,” said Whyte,
75, staring at a plastic tray of reheated meat and limp green beans, as he
sat outside his Marion Avenue house.
The city and most Bronx officials contend that, after some initial bumps,
the transition to the Senior Options pilot program has been smooth. The
controversial change consolidated the Bronx’ meals providers from 17 to two,
and substituted frozen meals for hot ones. A percentage of seniors receive
reheated meals daily, while others get a stack of frozen ones weekly.
RAIN, the area provider, was plagued by delivery problems when it first took
over the program. But as the months rolled on, the criticism quieted.
“We haven’t heard any complaints in months,” said Christopher Miller, a
spokesperson for the city Department for the Aging (DFTA). “Lots of issues
have been sorted out.”
Louis Vasquez, the director of RAIN, also said that the pilot was a success.
“[There have been] no complaints. None,” he said firmly after a budget press
conference with Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrión.
Officials, including Carrión, Council Member Joel Rivera, and Council Member
Oliver Koppell, all say that complaints have dwindled. “They are down to a
small trickle,” Carrión said after his press conference.
But Koppell contends that seniors still aren’t satisfied, and have given up
trying to get their criticisms heard. “How often can you complain?” he
asked.
Koppell believes that seniors are especially upset with the food quality.
“One woman said it was inedible,” he said. “It’s completely different than
they got [before].”
A taste test of one frozen meal of meat, carrots and potatoes, by the
Norwood News found that the food was almost inedible. The carrots were
rubbery, the sauce on the meat was watery, and all the food had a somewhat
sour taste. (The friend of a senior who doesn’t like the food gave the meal
to the paper.)
Ashley Geleta, a home attendant who works for Whyte and other area seniors,
says many of her clients throw away the meals and just drink the milk and
juice. “It’s terrible,” she said. “A lot of people complain.”
Whyte, who is diabetic, also said that the meals lack variety. “It’s lasagna
every day,” he said.
Rivera, who supported the pilot, said that frozen meals have been
successfully used in the city’s weekend meals program. “We never had a
problem with this before,” he said.
The pilot will run until this fall, and then undergo an assessment by
independent evaluators. If approved, the city had said that the Bronx
program will be renewed and implemented citywide.
But whether the pilot will expand, or just remain in the Bronx, remains a
question. The mayor’s revised budget released this month restores $17
million to senior services, including meals programs. A projection of the
budget until 2009 holds funding for general senior services at these levels,
according to data provided by the city comptroller’s office.
The budget predicts that the city will save $8 million in fiscal year 2006
through the pilot program, but doesn’t indicate that the savings will
expand. This could signify that the program won’t expand citywide this year,
if ever.
“The mayor has abandoned plans to expand the program, or at least postponed
it,” said Koppell, an outspoken critic of Senior Options. Koppell said that
Mark Page, the director of the city Office of Management and Budget, told
him the expansion wasn’t happening now.
But DFTA contends that the expansion was never on the table, and it will
only be considered after the evaluation this fall. Miller was deliberately
vague about what senior services would have been cut in the original budget.
“Senior services would have been maintained,” he said repeatedly.
Senior Options was originally touted as a necessary measure to increase
efficiency and save the city money. The mayor and most Bronx Democrats have
rigidly stood by the overhaul, though it ignited a firestorm of criticism.
Some critics allege that the pilot began in the Bronx because Vasquez has
close ties with Assemblyman Jose Rivera and other Democratic regulars.
Vasquez and city officials have repeatedly denied the charge.
Council Speaker Gifford Miller, a new ally of Koppell’s and a mayoral
candidate, has spearheaded a postcard campaign demanding the return of hot
meals. “The speaker sees it’s a vulnerability of the mayor’s,” Koppell said.
Back to News
Index Page

News | Opinion | Schools
| Features | Continuing Stories | Home
About Us | Past Issues
 |